Has anyone else but me noticed an inherent contradiction in the underlying convictions that drive annual “Earth Day” celebrations? The vast majority of those who attend such fetes are Darwinists who believe humans have a moral obligation to protect the environment. My question is: Why?
For millions of years “Mother Nature” has spewed noxious fumes and poisonous gasses into the atmosphere and littered the landscape with ash and lava without our help. She's killed species we never saw and heated and cooled the earth solo. Indeed, the most “natural” condition in the universe is death. As far as we know, Earth is completely unique; death reigns everywhere else.
Species have passed into extinction at a steady rate from the beginning of time, the strong supplanting the weak. Why shouldn’t they? Each is in a struggle-to-the-death for survival. It is a dance of destruction that fuels the evolutionary process as every creature exploits every other creature for its own benefit. Survival of the fittest - that’s evolution.
No locust swarm stops short of denuding a field because it ought to “leave a bit for the crickets. After all, they all have a right to be here.” The logic of naturalism and the rules of evolution dictate human beings rape our environment, just as everything else does, not protect it.
The moral obligations underpinning Earth Day simply do not follow from the naturalistic world view that embraces Darwinism.
Now, I am for conservation and stewardship of the Earth. But that follows, rather, from a theistic world view in which God has created man as unique and given him responsibility over the Earth to care for it. Earth Day makes sense for Christians, not for Darwinists.
No comments:
Post a Comment