Showing posts with label Eschatology-Millennium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eschatology-Millennium. Show all posts

Thursday, April 19, 2007

A Present or Future Millennium?

byKim Riddlebarger @ http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com

Part of the problem is that dispensational premillennial writers have completely dominated Christian media and publishing. There are literally hundreds of books, churches, and parachurch ministries all devoted to taking premillennialism and the “pretribulation” rapture idea to the masses. And so, I can only lament the fact that my own tradition has done so little to produce popular books introducing and defending amillennialism. It is my guess that many who read this article will have never heard the case for the classical position held by the church regarding the return of Christ and the millennial age.

Another problem encountered when examining this subject is that discussions of it often generate a great deal of heat but not very much light. One local prophecy pundit has quipped that the people in heaven with the lowest IQs will be amillennial. Hal Lindsey goes so far as to label amillennialism as anti-Semitic, demonic and heretical. It is not uncommon to hear prophecy teachers label amillennial Christians as “liberal” or to accuse them of not taking the Bible literally. The result of such diatribes is that American Christians cannot help but be prejudiced by such unfortunate comments, and many simply reject outright (without due consideration of the other side) the eschatology of the Reformers and classical Protestantism–an eschatology that is amazingly simple, biblical, and Christ centered. And so, if you should be in that camp, instead of simply turning me off at this point, please bear with me, hear my case, and then decide for yourself on the basis of Scripture.


Most American Evangelicals are firmly committed to the idea that an earthly millennial age will begin immediately after our Lord Jesus Christ's Second Advent. Since premillennialism is so dominant in American church circles, many who encounter historic Protestantism for the first time are quite surprised when they discover that all of the Protestant Reformers and the entire Reformed and Lutheran traditions are amillennial. Amillennialism is that understanding of eschatology which sees the millennium not as a future golden age as does premillennialism (the age of the church triumphant), but instead as the present course of history between the First and Second Advents of our Lord (the age of the church militant). Indeed, there are many readers who will express shock and disappointment upon learning of my own amillennial convictions. But I am convinced, however, that many readers simply do not understand the basic end-times scenario found in the New Testament.

To read the rest of this article, click here

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Was Jesus an Amil?

One of the questions Dr. MacArthur asked in his speech Wednesday morning was, "Was Jesus an Amil?" He asked us to turn to Acts 1:1-7.

Dr. MacArthur "camped out" on verse three and drove home the point that for forty days Jesus taught the disciples about the kingdom. Dr. MacArthur noted then in verse six that the disciples asked, "Lord, will You at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?" To which MacArthur said, "Jesus said 'No!'.

But I have read verses seven and eight and I still can not find where Jesus said, "No." I did read where Jesus said that His power will come upon them to be witnesses globally. I did read where Peter declared that Jesus was seated on the throne of David which means the kingdom has arrived. See Acts 2:29-36. Peter also said in Acts 3:22ff that Moses prophesied of the NC church and "all the prophets from Samuel and those who follow... have also foretold these days." In other words, "these days" are the days of the kingdom that the OT prophets were prophesying the fulfilling of the covenant made with Abraham. Peter explains it this way: "You are sons of the prophets, and the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying to Abraham, 'And in your seed all the families of the earth shall be blessed.' To you first, God, having raised up His Servant Jesus, sent Him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from your iniquities (Acts 3:25-26)."

So it is clear from a normal reading that Peter meant exactly what he said, the NC church is the fulfillment of the OT covenants. God has kept His promises faithfully and Christ is the sum and substance of those promises!

Concerning Dr. MacArthur's assertion that Amillers deny sovereign election, I am appalled. Not only am a five-point-plus Calvinist, I believe that the Body of Christ is the proof of sovereign election! And while Dispys are focusing on the physical typological nature of God's covenants, Amillers recognize that those types pointed to and were fulfilled in Christ. While Dispys focus on the land Abraham was to get, Amillers focus on the same thing as the Apostle Peter, namely, "In your seed all the families of the earth shall be blessed."

The exaltation of Christ seated him as the promised King who shall restore God's Israel. Christ has been exalted and His kingdom was established and is expanding. Peter explained further in Acts 5:31, "Him God has exalted to His right hand to be Prince and Savior, to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins." Notice this is about Israel. The Dispys say, "No, it will be about Israel in the future." Well that is not what Peter said in the very next verse (Acts 5:32), "And we are His witnesses to these things, and so also is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey Him." Peter claimed to be a witness of the restoration of Israel!

The same is confirmed in the entirety of Stephen's sermon in Acts 7.

And by the way, when Abraham got to the promised land, he himself recognized that it was not about the land but Christ according to Hebrews 11:9-10. In fact, the writer of Hebrews explained that Abraham "did not receive the promise" until they were united with the NC church (Hebrews 11:39-40). The "perfection" of Hebrews 11:40 is the NC church, united as the Body of Christ by His Spirit. Two verses later the writer explains that Jesus is "the author and finisher of our faith!

So was Jesus amil? Friends, Jesus IS the millennium!

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Thinking Through the Millennium and Revelation 20

By John @ http://thereformedbaptistthinker.blogspot.com/

A friend of mine recently asked about my view on the millennium as well as any resources I reccomended for further study on this end times debate. I thought some of you that read my blog may also find my brief response useful, so the following is my reply:

It has taken me several years, much reading, and changing of positions to be comfortable with where I am at now. In any case, I am amillennial. Honestly, I cannot point to a single source that really swung me one way or the other. It was spending time reading and studying the relevant biblical texts in light of the debate. For me, it all began with IVPs The Meaning of the Millennium: Four Views. This book was a good overview, but did not convince me (on its own) of amillennialism. I just read a lot from different perspectives over time.

For some good reading on amillennialism, a contemporary defender is Kim Riddlebarger. He has a section of his site devoted to On-Line Resources for Amillennial Eschatology, including "Links to Helpful Books, Essays, and Charts.". He has written a good introductory article, regularly answers questions (part 1 and part 2), and written a book defending amillennialism: A Case for Amillennialism.

In any case, the motherload of eschatology articles online is through Monergism.com. You could spend *years* reading through all of these great resources (from different Reformed perspectives).

Sam Waldron has also written an introductory book, The End Times Made Simple. And while I had serious issues with some of it, Stanley Grenz' The Millennial Maze is still a good compare/contrast for a discerning reader.