For those who suspected that there were serious theological problems with the popular book, The Shack, an interview with William Young should confirm your suspicions. In this sound bite, William Young denies the Penal Substitutionary Atonement and espouses other strange doctrines. The entire interview can be heard here.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Shack Author Denies Substitutionary Atonement
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Why ‘The Shack’ Is So Deceptive
Stephen Altrogge @ http://www.theblazingcenter.com gives an overview of The Shack:
If you haven’t yet heard about the book The Shack, you will. Written by a man named William Young, the book is making all sorts of waves, both in Christian and non-Christian circles. For the last several months it’s been hanging around the best seller charts, and it has people talking about how it has transformed their relationship with God. This weekend I decided to grab a copy of The Shack and see what all the hype was about. After reading the book I came away with two conclusions. I believe that William Young was a well intentioned guy who was trying to help people understand God better, and I don’t doubt that some people have been affected by the book. However, the book is full of blatant heresy and really does misrepresent the God of the Bible.
In the review he covers:
Intimacy vs. Holiness
I don’t need to punish people for sin. Sin is its own punishment, devouring you from the inside. It’s not my purpose to punish it; it’s my joy to cure it.
Rules vs. Relationship
The Bible doesn’t teach you to follow rules. It is a picture of Jesus.
Compare this with: 1 John 5:2-3 says:
By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and obey his commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome.
From the summary:
The Bible never drives a wedge between obedience to Jesus and a relationship with Jesus. Psalm 119 is a beautiful testimony to the freedom that comes from obeying the laws of God. Yet the theme of freedom versus rules is repeated over and over again in The Shack.
-----------------
For an indept review see: Tim Challies.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Book Review: “Become a Better You” by Joel Osteen
Review by Tim Challies @ http://www.challies.com
There are few things I love to eat more than bread. I just love a good loaf of white bread. I eat it the way many people eat junk food (and, I suppose, one could argue that it is junk food). Not too long ago we bought a bread maker from a person nearby who was selling all his possessions to move back to his native Poland, having found that North American living was not to his liking. The machine worked well for five loaves but on the sixth, while the bread was being kneaded, I heard a strange grinding sound followed by a sharp crack. I opened the machine and saw that the paddle, the piece that beats against the dough, had broken. I removed the lump of dough and decided I could simply put it in a bread pan and bake it on my own. A few minutes later I pulled the loaf from the oven. It looked just perfect—golden brown on top and shaped a whole lot better than the loaves that come out of the bread maker. I eagerly cut into it, looking forward to enjoying a slice of bread. But, to my surprise, I cut into, well, nothing, really. Apparently the dough had not been properly kneaded. The loaf of bread was full of air; it was full of nothing. I had baked a crust.
As I thought about Joel Osteen’s new book, Become a Better You, I was reminded of that sad, pathetic little loaf of bread because this book, like that bread, is form without substance. This is Osteen’s second book, and the follow-up to his bestselling Your Best Life Now. Like the previous title, this one features a picture of the smiling pastor on the front cover and offers seven steps to a better life. Like Your Best Life Now much of the book follows this format: “The way to ______ is not to ______. Instead, you need to ______. You might say, ‘But Joel, I can’t do ______ and ______.’ I know it’s hard. Rise to the challenge. Don’t let yourself get beat up or knocked down. God has so much more for you.” And like his previous book, this one is maddeningly repetitive. It is a handful of his sermonettes for Christianettes expanded into 380 pages of mind-numbing repetition.
The book is divided into seven parts, which together are sure to improve your life every day. “What does it mean to become a better you? First, you must understand that God wants you to become all that He created you to be. Second, it is imperative that you realize that God will do His part, but you must do your part as well.” To become a better you, you must following the seven steps:
- Keep pressing forward
- Be positive toward yourself
- Develop better relationships
- Form better habits
- Embrace the place where you are
- Develop your inner life
- Stay passionate about life
Each step is broken into several chapters and each part ends with a series of Action Points intended to give the reader concrete steps to tak to improve his life. It is, frankly, a lot like every other self-help book on the market today, but with one crucial difference—this one is built, supposedly, upon the Bible.
As I closed the cover on this book I began to wonder, What is it that draws people to Joel Osteen? Why do people enjoy his teaching so much? After all, tens of thousands of people attend his church each week and hundreds of thousands more watch him on television. He has become one of America’s most popular pastors, even while he teaches things that most pastors would testify are inconsistent with the Bible.
I think the secret to Osteen’s success is this: he teaches self-help but wraps it in a thin guise of Christian terminology. Thus people believe they are being taught the Bible when the reality is that they are learning mere human wisdom rather than divine wisdom. Osteen cunningly blends the wisdom of this age with language that sounds biblical. He blends the most popular aspects of New Age and self-help teaching with Christianity. And his audience is eagerly drinking this in.
And this raises an important and related question. What is Osteen’s authority? On what authority does he base what he teaches? Christians have long understood that the only authority we have when it comes to spiritual matters is authority given to us by God through the Bible. We are committed to teaching only things that are consistent with God’s revelation of Himself in the Bible. Without the Bible we have no authority. A pastor has no right to stand in front of a congregation and teach people what he believes. Rather, the pastor is to stand in front of the congregation and teaches people what God says about Himself. He bases all he does and says on this standard. In reading Joel Osteen we do not see this manner of authority. In reading Osteen we see a man who appeals to himself and to his own understanding and experience as authority. Rarely does he appeal to the Bible (66 times in 380 pages). Never will the discerning reader feel that Osteen has sought to understand the Bible first. Rather, it seems that he looks to the Bible to prove what he has already written or what he already believes. He uses the Bible, but not as a source of authority.
This is not to say that Osteen has no understanding of Christianity. Become a Better You contains some teaching that seems consistent with the Bible, and certainly there is lots of Christian terminology woven in. But Osteen teaches what is clearly a woefully inadequate theology of sin, repentance, sanctification and life. Osteen seems unable or unwilling to bring the power of the gospel to bear on life—real life. Life, he teaches, is not a meant to bring glory to God, but is meant to bring blessing and ease to the individual. He occasionally shares words that approximate the gospel, but ones that always stop short of providing the complete gospel as we find it in the Bible. “We’ve all sinned, failed, and made mistakes,” he says, “But many people don’t know they can receive God’s mercy and forgiveness.” That sounds fair, but he goes on to say, “As long as you’re doing your best and desire to do what’s right according to God’s Word, you can be assured God is pleased with you.” Is it enough to desire to do what’s right? Is God pleased with those who do their best? “That accusing voice will come to you and tell you, ‘You lost your temper last week in traffic.’ Your attitude should be, ‘That’s okay. I’m growing.’” But sin is never okay, whether we are growing or not. We can never excuse sin and can never minimize it.
My encouragement to those who intend to read this book and to those who enjoy the ministry of Joel Osteen is simply this: examine his authority. If you love Joel Osteen for who he is—a charismatic, smiling, successful, wealthy purveyor of advice—you will appreciate this book. It may change the way you live. But in that end that is all just puff. It’s like bread that is nothing but crust. If you are looking for teaching with true substance and for teaching that can really transform a life and renew a heart, look for a teacher who relies on an authority outside of himself—look for a person who humbly and faithfully teaches the Bible and who brings the wisdom of the Bible to bear on all of life.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
The Secret
by Kirk M. Wellum @ ttp://redeemingthetime.blogspot.com
Mel Lawrence, senior pastor of Elmbrook Church in Brookfield, Wisconsin, has written an excellent little critique of "The Secret" edited by Rhonda Byrne. It can be found here on the Christianity Today website. For those of you who have not heard of "The Secret," it is a book that flew off the shelves after being recommended by none other than Oprah, whose blessing almost guarantees a buying frenzy among the blissfully ignorant. The book claims that the secret of success (what else) is universally accessible in everything from ancient Babylonian religion to Buddhism to Albert Einstein. What is the secret you ask? Basically that thoughts are magnetic and when released into the universe they return to us bringing what we desire attached to them. It is the law of attraction in action so if we think about wealth we will become wealthy, if we think about health we will be healthy, and so on ad nauseam.
But is this really "the secret" or just a whopping lie? Isn't this the sort of thing that the "ruler of this world" has been telling foolish human beings since the beginning of time? Surely this is nothing more than the old demonic deception that you are at the centre of the universe and it revolves around you. Never mind living for God and his glory, never mind that the logical implication of the secret is that you are responsible for your poverty, your sickness, your lack of fulfillment or whatever else is not going the way you would like. It is the message that you are sovereign and you can get what you want if you only know how to manipulate the powers of the universe. Good grief! Are we really this dumb after all these years!
Lawrence quotes Professor Robert Thompson of Syracuse University who says: "The Secret promises this heaven on Earth in one fell swoop by simply desiring something, by simply wanting it. It's amazing how we really are a nation of, at best, great optimists, at worst, real suckers." That sums it up perfectly especially if we add that we are a nation of rebellious sinners who listen to the so-called wisdom of this world rather than the wisdom of God that is found in Jesus Christ.
The really sad thing is that many "Christians" will read the book and think it is wonderful. They will not see that it is a radical departure from the word of God and they will not quickly identify the erroneous reasoning. Following Jesus is never easy, and some of the most devoted Christians have suffered the loss of all things including life itself, not because they did not know the law of attraction but because they followed him who is the way, the truth and the life. Although considered fools by this world and unlikely to gain the approbation of television's egomaniacs, false prophets and the foolish crowds who hang on their every word, in the end it will be revealed to all that those who followed the Lamb wherever he goes knew what really matters.
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
The Danger of Heretical Books
Posted by Darrell Brooker at http://drbrooker.net/
You know, there is a lot of truth in what Spurgeon says here. We need to be careful in what we read. I’m sure it is true with almost all of us that the level of discernment we have been given is a level that is less than what we believe it to be. I know for myself that I’ve read books that were heretical and I can say with some surety that most of them did me very little good. I may be able to talk with some authority to the specific error of a certain writer, but I’m not so sure it has been good for my soul to, as Spurgeon says, have it ‘dragged through a ditch’ and have had the word of God that is hidden in my heart ‘mingled with the errors of men.’ I have a book sitting on my desk that I was going to crack open tonight that I know denies the gospel of justification by faith alone. I’m going to stick it in a drawer for awhile because other than a blog review, I don’t know what good it will do me to read. I think it’s like this: if I walked into a room with a pungent smell, I may not be able to tell you why exactly it smells that way, or where exactly the smell it emanating from; but I can tell you with some confidence that something stinks. As Christians, we may not always be able to adequately repudiate every error that comes across our path, or give intricate rebuttals to every new teaching, but because of the Spirit and our understanding of God’s word, we can know that certain teachings “stink.” And sometimes, that is as good a description as we can give, and it’s not a bad thing to be content with that.
I am asked sometimes to read an heretical book: well, if I believed my reading it would help its refutation, and might be an assistance to others in keeping them out of error, I might do it as a hard matter of duty, but I shall not do it unless I see some good will come of it. I am not going to drag my spirit through a ditch for the sake of having it washed afterwards, for it is not my own. It may be that good medicine would restore me if I poisoned myself with putrid meat, but I am not going to try it: I dare not experiment on a mind which no longer belongs to me. There is a mother and a child, and the child has a book to play with, and a blacklead pencil. It is making drawings and marks upon the book, and the mother takes no notice. It lays down one book and snatches another from the table, and at once the mother rises from her seat, and hurriedly takes the book away, saying: “No, my dear, you must not mark that, for it is not ours.” So with my mind, intellect, and spirit; if it belonged to me I might or might not play tomfool with it, and go to hear Socinians, Ritualists, Universalists, and suchlike preach, but as it is not my own, I will preserve it from such fooleries, and the pure word shall not be mingled with the errors of men.
-Taken from Flashes of Thought by C. H. Spurgeon, 1883, pp. 21-22