Friday, February 15, 2013
Morality: Defining Truth
Friday, March 12, 2010
Fellowship in Truth
The Bible is the only authoritative source from which Christianity is derived. Sound strange? That used to be the defining characteristic of evangelicalism.
Collectively evangelicals seem to have drifted far from that principle, and evangelicalism is taking on some strange shapes.
Thursday, May 08, 2008
Which Generation is Your Church Filled With?
In the first generation truth is a conviction.
- Those who hold that conviction, hold it dearly.
- They do not know the meaning of compromise.
- They are willing to die for what they believe to be true.
- Sons hold to the truths they have been taught by their fathers,
- and defend their beliefs in discussion and debate.
- However the keen edge of conviction has been blunted,
- and adherence to a body of beliefs inherited from the fathers is not so much a passion as a persuasion.
- By then some members of the movement are willing to trade in their opinions.
- They feel it is time for a change.
- They start talking about renewal,
- but they may look to the world for ideas.
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
"Well, That's Your Opinion..."
I'm sure that most Christians who have shared the message of Christ with an unbeliever has often been met with this statement:
"Well, that's your opinion."
According to the unbeliever, that solves all debate, but does it in reality? In this short clip, Mark Kielar explains why truth is truth, and why an opinion is just that.
http://www.crosstv.com
(From the series "Born Again")
Monday, January 22, 2007
Truth is The Most Glorious Thing!
Quoting Thomas Watson . . .
| [The violence meant in Matthew 11:12 is a holy violence]. We must be violent for the truth. Here Pilate's question will be cited, "What is truth?" Truth is either the blessed Word of God which is called the Word of truth, or those doctrines which are deduced from the Word, and agree with it, just as the dial with the Sun or the transcript with the original. These include the doctrine of the trinity, the doctrine of creation, the doctrine of free grace, justification by the blood of Christ, [the resurrection] of the dead, and the life of glory. These truths we must be violent for, which is either by being advocates for them or martyrs.
Truth is the most glorious thing! The least filing of this gold is precious. What shall we be violent for, if not for truth? Truth is ancient; it's grey hairs may make it venerable; it comes from Him who is the ancient of days. Truth is unerring; it is the star which leads to Christ. Truth is pure (Ps. 119:140). It is compared to silver refined seven times (Ps. 12:6). There is not the least spot on truth's face; it breaths nothing but sanctity.
Truth is triumphant; it is like a great conqueror when all his enemies lie dead; it keeps the field and sets up it's trophies of victory. Truth may be opposed but never quite deposed. In the time of Dioclesian things seemed desperate and truth ran low. Soon after was the golden time of Constantine, and then truth did again lift up it's head. When the water in the Thames river is lowest, a high tide is read to come in. God is on truth's side and so long as there is no fear it will prevail, "The heavens being on fire shall be dissolved" (2 Peter 3:12), but not that truth which came from heaven (1 Pet. 1:25). Truth has noble effects. Truth is the seed of the new birth. God does not regenerate us by miracles or revelations, but by the word of truth (James 1:18). As truth is the breeder of grace, so it is the feeder of it (1 Tim 4:6). Truth sanctifies: "Sanctify them through thy truth" (John 17:17). Truth is the seal that leaves the print of it's own holiness upon us; it is both speculum and lavacrum, a glass to show us our blemishes and a laver to wash them away. Truth makes us free (John 8:32). It bears off the fetters of sin and puts us into a state of sonship (Rom. 8:11), and kingship (Rev. 1:6). Truth is comforting; this wine cheers. When David's harp and viol could yield him no comfort, truth did: "This is my comfort in my affliction: for Thy word has quickened me" (Ps. 119:50). Truth is an antidote against error. Error is the Truth is the best flower in the church's crown; we have not a richer jewel to trust God with than our souls, nor He a richer jewel to trust us with than His truths. Truth is insigne honoris, an ensign of honor; it distinguishes us from the false church, as chastity distinguishes a virtuous woman from an harlot. ... What then should we be violent for, if not for truth? | ||
| From: | ||
Monday, October 23, 2006
Truth and Love
Think with me for a moment about education and relationships. Some of you care deeply that education not ignore or marginalize relationships of love. They are essential in real, lasting, life-changing education. Amen.
So I turn to the Bible. I find in place of the words, "education" and "relationship," the words, "truth" and "love." So what does the Bible say about how truth and love relate to each other? There are at least four ways of talking about this relationship.
1. Truth aims at love.
"The goal of our instruction is love from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith" (1 Timothy 1:5). Note: instruction is not the goal, love is. Instruction is the means. It is subordinate. Truth serves love. Education serves relationships - mainly the relationship between us and God, but also between Christian and Christian, and between us and unbelievers. The "goal" of all our education is love.
"Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider one another how to stir up to love and good deeds, . . . encouraging one another" (Hebrews 10:23-25, literal translation). The aim of our "considering one another" and "encouraging one another" is that we stir up love. We mingle insight into "the confession of our hope" with insight into "each other," and the effect is stirring each other to love. The truth of doctrine and truth of people-watching unite to aim at love.
2. Love aims at truth.
"Love does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth" (1 Corinthians 13:6). Love is glad when truth is spoken. Therefore love aims at truth. It supports truth.
"Out of much affliction and anguish of heart I wrote to you with many tears; not so that you would be made sorrowful, but that you might know the love which I have especially for you" (2 Corinthians 2:4). Here is an example of how love aims at truth. Paul is filled with love and it compels him to write a letter that was hard, and caused sorrow in him and in the Corinthians. But it needed to be said. So love said it. Love speaks the truth personally and doctrinally.
3. Love shapes how to speak the truth.
"Speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in all aspects into Him who is the head, even Christ" (Ephesians 4:15). There is an unloving way to speak the truth. That kind of truth-speaking we should repudiate. But there is a way to speak the truth in love, and that we should seek. It is not always a soft way to speak, or Jesus would have to be accused of lack of love in dealing with some folks in the Gospels.
But it does ask about what is the most helpful thing to say when everything is considered. Sometimes what would have been a hard word to one group is a needed act of love to another group, and not a wrong to the group addressed. But in general, love shapes truth into words and ways that are patient and gentle (2 Timothy 2:24-25).
4. Truth shapes how to show love.
"By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and observe His commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments; and His commandments are not burdensome" (1 John 5:2). It is not always obvious which acts are loving. So John tells us some truth will help us know if our acts are loving.
One truth test for our love is whether we are keeping the commandments of God toward people. In other words, love cannot be cut loose from the truth of God's will. Truth shapes how to show love.
Let us pray that God will cause his love and truth to abound and mingle in us in all these ways for the glory of his truth-filled love and love-filled truth.
Pastor John
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Truth: Not Reasoned But Revealed
By Darren Brooker
This week’s excerpt from Horatius Bonar is taken from a little known work entitled Man: His Religion and His World written in 1851. In it, Bonar makes the clear distinction between the two types of religion in the world: the one true faith that comes from the revelation of God Himself in the person of Jesus Christ and His word, and all the false religions that derive themselves from the opinions of sinful man. Apart from revelation, man is incapable of discovering anything about God. Apart from revelation all men everywhere would be condemned and die in their sin. But God, in His mercy and love, chose to reveal Himself to some. It his His grace alone that saves, and the vanity and pride of men that condemns.
In truth, the formation of a religion has been generally looked upon as a sort of art; and a body of men, accordingly, have been always set apart for the purpose of constructing one. Man’s desire has always been to have a hand in the construction of his religion, to prescribe to himself how he ought to worship God, and to dictate to God how He ought to be worshipped. What religion is, and how it ought to be carried on, are points which man has undertaken to settle by his own wisdom, and to regulate by his own devices. But it is very evident that, both as to what God is, and how He is to be approached, or whether He will permit Himself to be approached at all, man can know nothing, and determine nothing. God only can make known these things. Man’s opinions upon them are mere vanity, and the offspring of pride. They are certain to be wrong; for the points are so far above man’s vision, and so inaccessible, that he must miserably misconceive them. He knows little of himself, and nothing of God; so that it is not even within the limits of possibility that he can be right.
Yet there is nothing almost of which man is so tenacious, as his right of thinking for himself (as he calls it) in matters of religion. In so far as this means merely that his fellow-men have no right to think for him, or to prescribe a religion for him, he is right. But in so far as he is claiming for himself a right of forming opinions independent of God, he is wrong—awfully wrong. Man has no right to think for himself apart from God, or independent of the Revelation of God. God’s declarations are to be received in unquestioning simplicity. What we are to believe, what we are to do, how we are to worship, are not matters of opinion or speculation: they are truths—truths not reasoned out or demonstrated by man, but dictated by God, and coming to us, therefore, with a certainty which man cannot add to or improve, and which no strength of mathematical demonstration can surpass.
This thinking for one’s self independently of God and His Revelation, is not merely an evil, but a sin. Nay, it is a sin of more than common darkness—it is so audacious, so contemptuous towards God. It places man on a level with God, or at least sets Divine truth and human opinion on the same footing. It strips the former of all innate authority, while it gives to the latter an authority to which it has no claim.
It makes man the teacher, not the listener or the learner. If it does not call good evil, and evil good; if it does not put light for darkness, and darkness for light, it at least claims the right of saying what is evil and what is good—what is light and what is darkness. It is another development of the old temptation, “Ye shall he as gods, knowing good and evil.” …There can be no authority save that which is infallible and Divine, that is, God speaking to us directly in His Word.
-Taken from Man: His Religion and His World, 1851, Part I, Chapter 1, The Life and Works of Horatius Bonar.
In truth, the formation of a religion has been generally looked upon as a sort of art; and a body of men, accordingly, have been always set apart for the purpose of constructing one. Man’s desire has always been to have a hand in the construction of his religion, to prescribe to himself how he ought to worship God, and to dictate to God how He ought to be worshipped. What religion is, and how it ought to be carried on, are points which man has undertaken to settle by his own wisdom, and to regulate by his own devices. But it is very evident that, both as to what God is, and how He is to be approached, or whether He will permit Himself to be approached at all, man can know nothing, and determine nothing. God only can make known these things. Man’s opinions upon them are mere vanity, and the offspring of pride. They are certain to be wrong; for the points are so far above man’s vision, and so inaccessible, that he must miserably misconceive them. He knows little of himself, and nothing of God; so that it is not even within the limits of possibility that he can be right.